Renewables · PPAs and the 80% rule

Do Ireland's data centres run on renewables?

No Irish data centre runs physically on 100% renewable power: they draw the grid mix, which in 2025 was 48% gas as a share of domestic generation (40.2% of demand, Ember, incl. imports). Data-centre firms have announced 1,909 MW of Irish power purchase agreements, and new sites must match 80% of demand with new Irish renewables (CRU, December 2025).

Updated 10 October 2026 · data build 2026-10-10 · how we know · corrections

Is there enough new renewable power for them?

Figure 1

Which renewables can count toward the 80%, and is there enough?

Data-centre growth to 2034 needs about 4.16 TWh a year of new, unsubsidised Irish renewables. Permitted wind and solar without a state contract could supply about 6.0 TWh on our estimate, and wind alone falls short.

Renewable supply that can and cannot count toward data centres' 80% match, in TWh a yearNeeded: 4.16 TWh a year. Permitted onshore wind, no state contract: about 3.67 TWh, can count. Permitted solar, no state contract: about 2.31 TWh, can count. Merchant offshore wind (Oriel, Arklow Bank 2): about 4.63 TWh, can count. Data-centre PPAs already announced: about 3.55 TWh, cannot count. Wind and solar with a state (RESS) contract: about 8.16 TWh, cannot count.Needed: 4.16 TWh a year80% OF EIRGRID'S FORECAST DATA-CENTRE DEMAND GROWTH, 2025→2034Permitted onshore wind, no state contractCAN COUNTPermitted onshore wind, no state contract: about 3.67 TWh a year3.7About 1,397 MW with planning permission and no RESS award. The scarce product: on its own it fallsshort of the need.Permitted solar, no state contractCAN COUNTPermitted solar, no state contract: about 2.31 TWh a year2.3About 2,397 MW, mostly estimated from site area. Produces mainly in summer daytime.Merchant offshore wind (Oriel, Arklow Bank 2)CAN COUNTMerchant offshore wind (Oriel, Arklow Bank 2): about 4.63 TWh a year4.61,175 MW that lost the 2023 auction. Still in planning; not before about 2031–32, and no data-centrecontract signed.Data-centre PPAs already announcedCAN'T COUNTData-centre PPAs already announced: about 3.55 TWh a year3.5Older deals serve existing sites and don't count toward the new rule.Wind and solar with a state (RESS) contractCAN'T COUNTWind and solar with a state (RESS) contract: about 8.16 TWh a year8.2State-supported output is excluded by CRU/2025/236 (only full repowering can count).
Renewable supply that can and cannot count toward data centres' 80% match, in TWh a yearNeeded: 4.16 TWh a year. Permitted onshore wind, no state contract: about 3.67 TWh, can count. Permitted solar, no state contract: about 2.31 TWh, can count. Merchant offshore wind (Oriel, Arklow Bank 2): about 4.63 TWh, can count. Data-centre PPAs already announced: about 3.55 TWh, cannot count. Wind and solar with a state (RESS) contract: about 8.16 TWh, cannot count.Needed: 4.16 TWh a year80% OF FORECAST DC GROWTH, 2025→2034Permitted onshore wind, no state contractCAN COUNTPermitted onshore wind, no state contract: about 3.67 TWh a year3.7About 1,397 MW with planning permission and no RESSaward. The scarce product: on its own it falls short ofthe need.Permitted solar, no state contractCAN COUNTPermitted solar, no state contract: about 2.31 TWh a year2.3About 2,397 MW, mostly estimated from site area.Produces mainly in summer daytime.Merchant offshore wind (Oriel, Arklow Bank 2)CAN COUNTMerchant offshore wind (Oriel, Arklow Bank 2): about 4.63 TWh a year4.61,175 MW that lost the 2023 auction. Still in planning;not before about 2031–32, and no data-centre contractsigned.Data-centre PPAs already announcedCAN'T COUNTData-centre PPAs already announced: about 3.55 TWh a year3.5Older deals serve existing sites and don't count towardthe new rule.Wind and solar with a state (RESS) contractCAN'T COUNTWind and solar with a state (RESS) contract: about 8.16 TWh a year8.2State-supported output is excluded by CRU/2025/236 (onlyfull repowering can count).

The CRU rule counts only new renewables in the Republic that have no state support, so the large pool of RESS-contracted wind and solar (8.16 TWh a year) and the data-centre deals already announced for existing sites are ruled out. What remains is permitted onshore wind and solar still looking for a buyer, and two offshore wind farms that lost the 2023 auction and could sell to data centres from the early 2030s. The need of 4.16 TWh is 80% of the growth EirGrid forecasts from 9.4 TWh in 2025 to 14.6 TWh in 2034, a forecast cited second-hand in the CRU decision.

EstimateTWh from MW at assumed capacity factors: onshore wind 30%, solar 11% (unchecked round numbers; curtailment not deducted). Offshore output is EirGrid's deemed figure.

Sources: CRU/2025/236 s.3.5, 2025-12-12 · Planning registers via PlanSight (permitted pool); EirGrid RESS 1–5 results, 2026-10-10 · Company announcements (PPAs), compiled by StackPath, 2026-10-03 · EirGrid ORESS 1 results; offshore tracker, 2026-10-10

4.16 TWh
New renewables needed a year for 80% of demand growth to 2034
≈ 1.6 GW onshore wind
5.98 TWh
Permitted wind and solar with no state contract
4.4 GW · planning
1,909 MW
Corporate PPAs announced by data-centre operators
17 deals in the Republic

The supply gap, TWh a year

Needed: 80% of demand growth to 20344.16
Permitted, uncontracted wind + solar5.98
…of which onshore wind3.67

Assumed capacity factors: wind 30%, solar 11% (curtailment not deducted). Plants with state support (RESS/REFIT) can't count. Pool MW is mostly estimated from turbine counts and site area. "Growth" is EirGrid's 2025 → 2034 forecast (9.4 → 14.6 TWh, as cited in CRU2025236), one basis throughout; the CSO's metered 2025 figure (7.662 TWh) is lower and not comparable.

Corporate PPAs by buyer (MW)

Microsoft967
Amazon (AWS)334
Meta276
Facebook (Meta)179
Unnamed 'leading technology company'81
Google58
Keppel DC REIT14

No announced PPAs found for Equinix, Digital Realty, CyrusOne, EdgeConneX, Vantage or Echelon. Older deals serve existing sites and don't count toward the new rule.

For a renewable developer: permitted onshore wind without a state contract is the scarce product. The 4.16 TWh need is more than all of it (about 1.4 GW, ≈3.7 TWh a year); solar would have to fill the rest.

Annual vs hourly matching

A portfolio sized to meet Ireland's rule exactly (80% of annual energy, 80/20 wind/solar) matches about 70% of a flat load hour by hour, and covers 80% of load in only 50% of hours, so under Spain's draft it would fall in the top hourly-surcharge band in 12 of 12 months. Reaching 80% hourly-matched needs about 1.2x the load's annual energy in contracted output (1.5x what Ireland's rule requires); passing Spain's per-hour test in every hour is not reachable with wind and solar alone (even 3x gives 89% of hours).

MixContracted output, % of annual loadLoad matched hour by hourHours ≥80% covered (Spain's test)
wind only80%65.3%45.4%
80% wind / 20% solar80%69.5%50.1%
80% wind / 20% solar100%76.1%59.9%
80% wind / 20% solar150%84.9%74.2%
80% wind / 20% solar200%89.5%81.4%
80% wind / 20% solar300%93.9%89.2%
RuleMatchingThresholdStatus
IE CRU/2025/236 (decision, 12 Dec 2025)annualat least 80% of annual demandin force (connection policy); judicial review pending
ES Draft Royal Decree on data-centre sustainability and digital sovereignty (MITECO, urgent procedure)hourly80% of total consumption from additional renewables (Art. 8) AND each hour at least 80% backed by renewables generated in that hour (Art. 9)draft; public consultation 27 Aug-4 Sep 2026; final adoption not found as of 3 Oct 2026 (unchecked beyond press search)
DE EnEfG s.11(5) (in force since Nov 2023)annual balance ('bilanziell')50% from 1 Jan 2024, 100% from 1 Jan 2027in force

Flat 24/7 load; portfolio shaped like the national wind and solar fleet (EirGrid actual output, 2025-10 to 2026-09). The fleet is smoother than any single portfolio, so real figures would be lower. Spain's rule is a draft.

Could any operator pass an 80%-every-hour test today? model

Modelled on public data, none of the 6 operators with EPA-reported loads would pass an 80%-every-hour test today. Best placed on paper (every announced ROI deal counted as if fully built): Microsoft (70% of hours, 132% annual cover; counting only deals marked fully operational, 0% of hours and 13% cover, as 900 of its 967 MW are partly built, under construction or framework deals), Meta (32% of hours, 62% annual cover), Google (13% of hours, 25% annual cover). Passing every hour needs firm low-carbon supply close to 80% of load (77-81% after rounding) even with contracts topped up to 2x the load's energy and a 4-hour battery (still 86-88% of hours pass). With storage alone, a battery of 0.8x load would need about 121-126 hours (about 5 days) of storage: the longest Irish wind-and-solar lull sets the size.

Operator (EPA-licensed sites)Load 2025Irish CPPAsAnnual coverHours ≥80%Extra MW for 80% hourly-matchedFirm low-carbon MW to pass every hour
Amazon (AWS)425 MW334 MW24%0%1,781333
Microsoft154 MW967 MW
67 operating
132%
13% operating
70%
0% operating
0121
Meta135 MW455 MW62%32%365106
Google26 MW58 MW25%13%12220
Equinix19 MW0 MW0%0%9815
K2 Strategic18 MW0 MW0%0%9314

Estimates from a model, not site data: no hourly site loads or PPA outputs are public. Load = 2025 grid electricity in EPA annual reports, assumed flat; CPPAs = announced Irish deals by buyer at assumed capacity factors (wind 30%, solar 11%), shaped like the national fleet; the main figures count every announced deal as if built, and the grey "operating" line counts only deals marked fully operational (the truth for partly built portfolios lies between). 0% means no announced Irish CPPA was found, not that the operator buys no renewable power. Extra MW = new 80/20 wind/solar contracts. Firm MW assumes contracts topped up to 2× the load's energy plus a 4-hour battery of half the load. On-site gas engines are firm but not renewable, so they do not count; no campus document states an on-site battery. Spain's additionality rule is not applied.

PlanSight planning · EirGrid RESS 1–5 · company and developer announcements · CRU2025236 · MITECO draft decree (Aug 2026) · EnEfG §11 · EirGrid Smart Grid Dashboard · as of 2026-10-10

Every announced power purchase agreement in Ireland

DateBuyerProjectSellerMWNew build?
2025-05-01Keppel DC REITBallincolligGreencoat Renewables—no
2025-03-10MicrosoftBallylongford, CrossmoreEnergia Group—yes
2024-08-07Unnamed 'leading technology company'South Meath Solar FarmGreencoat Renewables / Schroders Greencoat (acquired from Statkraft)80.5—
2024-05-29Keppel DC REITGorey Solar (Co Wexford), Goresbridge Solar (Co Kilkenny)Mytilineos (Metlen) / M Renewables14.28yes
2024-05-02MicrosoftLenaleaSSE Renewables; FuturEnergy Ireland (ESB/Coillte JV)30yes
2024-05-01Amazon (AWS)DerrinloughBord na Móna105yes
2024-04-18Keppel DC REITBallybane Phase 1Greencoat Renewables—no
2023-10-09MetaTwo solar farms in Co Meath and Co Wexford (names not given)Highfield Energy (Highfield Solar)276no
2023-05-09GoogleTullabeg Solar FarmPower Capital Renewable Energy58yes
2022-11-24MicrosoftEnergia framework (first project: Drumlins Park 49 MW wind, Co Monaghan, operational Aug 2024); Power Capital solar portfolio in Cork, Louth and Meath (~150 MW)Energia Group; Power Capital Renewable Energy534yes
2022-11-23MicrosoftSix projects (3 wind, 3 solar) incl. Harlockstown Solar (34 MW, Co Meath) and a ~199 MW four-farm solar complex near Dublin (sold to ORIT in 2024)Statkraft366yes
2020-08-24Amazon (AWS)Ardderroo115yes
2020-08-07Facebook (Meta)Lisheen IIIBrookfield Renewable28.8yes
2019-08-01Amazon (AWS)EskInvis Energy23.2yes
2019-04-08Amazon (AWS)MeenbogInvis Energy91.2yes
2017-10-09MicrosoftTullahennelGE37yes
2016-04-07Facebook (Meta)Brookfield Irish wind portfolio (existing assets)Brookfield Renewable150no

Company announcements, compiled by StackPath. Northern Ireland deals excluded. MW as announced; some are shares of existing wind farms, not new build.